New Intelligence Report

Editor: Allen

---

Introduction

Humanity’s reliance on AI is growing rapidly — but what impact could this dependence have on our brains?

Key questions to consider:

• How should we use AI tools to minimize negative effects on cognition?
• What happens if our primary AI model suddenly goes offline?
• Are we unknowingly developing a constant, heavy dependence on AI in our daily work?
• Could the human brain fully delegate thinking to AI while focusing only on pleasure?
• What would society lose if this became the norm?

A recent blog explored these questions in depth, especially in writing and programming, compiling insights from leading voices in the AI field.

---

AI in Long-Term Tasks: More Errors Than Expected

AI shines in short-term tasks such as:

• Text auto-completion
• Code suggestions

These features boost efficiency and eliminate repetitive drudgery. For example, programming tools like Cursor reduce repetitive coding tasks, freeing developers to focus on architecture and design.

But caution is needed for long-term or creative work:

• AI lacks inspiration and intuition.
• Extended AI-run processes have higher error potential.
• Over-reliance may erode our own critical thinking skills.

Developer ThePrimeagen stresses: Task length and error tolerance are crucial factors when deciding to use AI.

As shown in the chart below:

• Short-term tasks → AI saves time
• Long-term decision-making → Risk of compounded errors

Suggested Task Allocation

Refer to the classification chart:

• Type I tasks: Human-led
• Type III tasks: AI-assisted

---

AI Writing: Lacking Emotion and Depth

Strengths:

• Fluent, grammatically correct text
• Clear structure

Limitations:

• No emotional resonance
• No life experience or intuitive insight
• “Smells” like AI-generated text

Human writing draws from unique experiences and conveys raw emotion — something AI cannot replicate. The result: AI-generated text often feels soulless.

---

AI as a Distraction and Skill Degrader

How AI reduces independent problem solving:

• Over-reliance on tools like auto-correction or code suggestions
• Decline in manual practice and creative struggle
• Shortcuts replace deep learning

Example from education:

• AI usage among students is high
• Handwritten homework is rare
• Teachers now rely on AI detectors (e.g., GPTZero) to gauge “AIGC rate”

> GPTZero detects whether text was generated by AI.

The long-term risk: practical skill degradation.

Key point: In programming and writing, hands-on practice and iteration are essential to mastery — “skill through repetition.”

---

Expert Perspectives: AI Cannot Replace Independent Thinking

Andrew Ng

• Programming and core skills will remain important.
• AI should assist learning, not replace it.
• Warning: Avoid advice suggesting not to learn programming due to AI automation — this may be one of the worst career tips in history.

---

Paul Graham

• Writing is part of thinking.
• Letting AI write for you removes opportunities for independent thought.
• AI standardizes content, unlike unique human expression.

---

Nathan Baugh

• AI-generated content may cause information floods and degrade skill foundations.
• Outsourcing writing to AI removes personality and uniqueness.

---

Ted Gioia

• AI cannot replace deep thinking or emotional creativity.
• Volume of output ≠ intellectual or emotional depth.

---

Mitchell Hashimoto

• AI supports innovation but true competitive advantage lies in knowing how to use it effectively — not relying on it blindly.

---

Careers and Skills AI Cannot Replace

While AI can assist in repetitive tasks, many professions remain human-driven:

• Data Engineering: Judgment, domain expertise, and understanding business context
• Artistic Creation: Emotional articulation and unique conceptual processing

Key takeaway:

Let AI handle boring, low-growth tasks — but retain mental control over strategic and creative thinking.

> The Matrix — “I think, therefore I am.”

---

Reference:

https://www.ssp.sh/brain/will-ai-replace-humans/#ai-slop---companies-not-doing-great

---

Balanced AI Use for Creators

Platforms like AiToEarn官网 offer an open-source AI content monetization ecosystem combining:

• AI generation
• Multi-platform publishing
• Analytics
• Model rankings

Supported platforms include Douyin, Kwai, WeChat, Bilibili, Rednote, Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, Threads, YouTube, Pinterest, and X (Twitter).

Docs: AiToEarn文档

Repo: AiToEarn开源地址

---

Further Reading:

Read the original article

Open in WeChat

---

Summary:

A mindful approach to AI usage — letting it handle routine work while humans lead in creativity — will help us maintain our thinking ability, learning capacity, and unique voice. As experts remind us, AI is a tool, not a replacement for human intellect.

---

Do you want me to also extract a concise executive summary from this improved version so it's easier to share internally?