Product Management Methodology: Rely on Systems, Not People

Overwhelmed by Exploding Requirements and Delays?

How Systems Thinking Can Save Your Projects

Do you often find yourself stuck in never-ending demands, project delays, or users breaking your carefully crafted rules?

These frustrating issues often share a single root cause: over-reliance on human self-discipline.

Systems Thinking offers a better path — by restructuring goals, elements, and connections, you shift collaboration from depending on people to depending on systems.

---

Common Pain Points

  • Endless Requests: Sales or customer service casually heap new tasks onto you, instantly wrecking your priority list.
  • Habitual Delays: Projects stretch like a rubber band; missed deadlines seem inevitable.
  • Rule-Breaking Users: Your well-designed workflows are constantly bypassed, triggering endless alarms.

Root cause? We expect people to be perfectly disciplined — and that expectation repeatedly disappoints.

The real breakthrough is redesigning the system, not the person.

---

From Weekend Chores to Work Challenges

The “Family War” Insight

Example: I hate mopping floors on weekends.

If I refuse, a casual remark like “Can’t you help a little?” could spark an argument — ruining the day.

This mirrors workplace frustrations:

We often lecture or criticize, hoping to “wake people up” so they’ll change.

Result: problems persist, patience erodes, relationships suffer.

My solution? Buy a robot vacuum.

No more dependence on self-discipline, no more arguments. The conflict point was eliminated.

> Lesson: Don’t try to fix people — fix the system.

---

What Is Systems Thinking?

Ancient wisdom: “Fix the structure, not the person.”

Modern revision: “Build the right system instead of blaming individuals.”

Formula:

System = Goals × Elements × Connections
  • Goals: Shared aims (e.g., “keep the home clean with minimal effort”). Misaligned goals create conflict.
  • Elements: Components (people, tools, time). Asking individuals to change yields short-lived results.
  • Connections: How parts interact. Key types:
  • Reinforcing Loop: Clean → good mood → more cleaning → cleaner.
  • Balancing Loop: Mess builds despite effort → equilibrium reached.
  • Delay Effect: Benefits of habit-building show over time, not instantly.

True fixes focus on goals and connections — rules, mechanisms, structures — rather than human behavior alone.

---

Case Study: Breaking the “Middle Platform Deadlock”

1. Challenges of a Low-Power PM

In 2021, I joined an education company using a middle-platform model:

  • Response to requests took 2–3 weeks.
  • My line’s needs were often deprioritized.
  • Cross-team communication drained half my energy.

Example request (“Let tutors filter refunded students”) was ignored three times.

---

2. Conventional Solutions (Dead Ends)

  • Escalate to management — increases conflict (symptom fix).
  • Plan earlier to align schedules — still dependent on others (cause fix).

---

3. Root Fix: Redesign the Collaboration System

Key changes:

  • Unified Goals: Serve all tutors, not just one line.
  • Transparent Demand Pool: Company-wide priority list.
  • Consensus Mechanism: Bi-weekly cross-team voting on priorities.
  • Clear Role Rules: Define platform vs. business responsibilities.

We treated both teams as one unit with distributed roles.

---

4. Results

  • Request time cut from 2–3 months → 2 weeks.
  • R&D utilization ↑ 40%.
  • Satisfaction rose from very dissatisfiedgenerally satisfied.

The system now runs itself, eliminating constant chasing or arguing.

---

Apply Systems Thinking Daily

Scenario 1: Demand Overload

Old Way: Nag people to follow process → ignored.

System Fix:

  • Unified request template with business objective and value metrics.
  • Auto-display average dev hours — builds cost awareness.
  • Tiered approval chains by priority — rules enforce discipline.

---

Scenario 2: Habitual Delays

Old Way: Pressure at stand-ups → stress, no change.

System Fix:

  • Fixed release cycle (“bus schedule”).
  • Full task visibility in project tools.
  • Automatic alerts for overrun tasks — early intervention.

---

Scenario 3: Users Breaking Rules

Old Way: Add notes beside actions → ignored.

System Fix:

  • Double Confirmation for irreversible actions.
  • Automatic Interruption of invalid inputs with clear prompts.
  • Undo/Draft Options for recovery.

---

The 3 Principles of Systems Thinking

  • Don’t blame people first — check for systemic flaws.
  • Adjust goals and connections before focusing on components (people).
  • Seek root solutions:
  • Symptom fix: suppress
  • Cause fix: alleviate
  • Root fix: eliminate

---

Why This Matters for Modern Creators

Just as in product management, creators benefit from systems that ensure consistency and efficiency.

Example: AiToEarn官网 — an open-source global AI content monetization platform that:

  • Connects AI generation tools
  • Publishes across platforms automatically (Douyin, Kwai, WeChat, Bilibili, Rednote/Xiaohongshu, Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, Threads, YouTube, Pinterest, X/Twitter)
  • Integrates analytics and AI model ranking

Impact: Content is created once, published everywhere — no reliance on self-reminders. This is systems thinking in action for creative productivity.

---

By embedding System Thinking into your workflow, whether for tech teams or creative projects, you replace human-dependent discipline with self-running, fair, and efficient mechanisms — freeing energy for innovation and value creation.

---

— End —

Read more

Translate the following blog post title into English, concise and natural. Return plain text only without quotes. 哈佛大学 R 编程课程介绍

Harvard CS50: Introduction to Programming with R Harvard University offers exceptional beginner-friendly computer science courses. We’re excited to announce the release of Harvard CS50’s Introduction to Programming in R, a powerful language widely used for statistical computing, data science, and graphics. This course was developed by Carter Zenke.