Quotes from Bruce Schneier and Barath Raghavan
Prompt Injection: An Intractable Challenge in Persistent-Memory LLMs
> Prompt injection may be fundamentally unsolvable in today’s LLMs.
> LLMs process sequences of tokens, but there is no mechanism to mark tokens with privilege levels. Every proposed solution opens up new injection vectors:
> - Delimiter? Attackers simply include the delimiters.
> - Instruction hierarchy? Attackers claim top priority.
> - Separate models? The attack surface doubles.
>
> Security depends on having boundaries, but LLMs inherently dissolve boundaries.
> [...]
>
> Poisoned states produce poisoned outputs, which then poison future states:
> - Summarize the conversation history? The summary itself may contain the injection.
> - Clear the cache to remove the poison? You lose all context.
> - Keep the cache for continuity? You retain the contamination.
>
> Stateful systems cannot forget attacks, making memory itself a liability. Adversaries can craft inputs capable of corrupting outputs well into the future.
>
> — Bruce Schneier and Barath Raghavan, Agentic AI’s OODA Loop Problem
---
Why This Matters
The insights above highlight that mitigating prompt injection — especially in systems with persistent state or memory — is not only complex but possibly infeasible with current architectures. Persistent memory means an injection can continue influencing outputs long after it is introduced.
---
Key Security Implications
- Memory as Liability
- Stateful LLM systems can inadvertently store and reuse harmful prompt injections.
- No Perfect Boundary Controls
- Attempts to segment or prioritize instructions (e.g., delimiters, hierarchies, multiple models) introduce new vulnerabilities.
- Compounding Contamination
- Once state is poisoned, outputs perpetuate the compromise.
---
Defensive Practices
While perfect security is unlikely, organizations and creators can still reduce risk through:
- Careful Prompt Design — minimize unnecessary inputs, constrain instructions.
- Rigorous Testing — simulate injection scenarios before deployment.
- Defensive Interaction Patterns — implement sanity checks, versioned prompts, and selective memory clearing.
- Monitoring Outputs — detect suspicious shifts in AI behavior early.
---
Implications for Multi-Platform AI Publishing
For those deploying AI-generated content across various channels, risk awareness is crucial.
Platforms like AiToEarn官网 demonstrate how AI content distribution can be streamlined and monetized globally — from Douyin and Kwai to Facebook and X (Twitter). However:
- Protect AI state integrity — ensure prompt inputs are safeguarded from external tampering.
- Maintain trust — users and audiences expect that published content is free from malicious injections.
- Secure multi-platform workflows — implement strong validation between creation and publishing stages.
---
> Bottom line: In current LLM systems, persistent memory makes prompt injection defense profoundly challenging. Security-conscious design, coupled with vigilant monitoring, is essential for safe and trusted AI deployment across platforms.
