Rising from Negative Performance Reviews to Become an Outstanding Developer

From Underperformance to Growth: My Google PIP Journey

Introduction

I was a year into my job at Google when, after repeated warnings about underperformance, my manager sat me down: I was being placed on a Performance Improvement Plan (PIP).

For those unfamiliar, a Google PIP is essentially an eight-week final chance to show measurable improvement. You’re assigned a high-stakes project and given a hard deadline. Deliver successfully — with no extensions, no partial credit — or be let go.

While financial worry for my family hit me immediately, a deeper fear emerged: What story would I tell future employers about my proudest project at Google ... if I had none?

That fear became my motivation. I committed to full ownership of my PIP project, focusing every week on delivering something I could be proud of — regardless of the outcome.

This was the turning point that transformed me into a disciplined, deliberate engineer.

---

Contents

---

The Backstory

Before Google, I worked at Meta, starting as an IC3 (entry-level engineer) and quickly promoting to IC4 (mid-level). My advancement came largely from connecting engineering work to business needs rather than deep technical ability.

At Meta, I improved a payment system by targeting operational inefficiencies — changes that saved time and reduced errors for enterprise clients. Collaboration and business acumen got me promoted.

Looking back, I realized I've underinvested in technical depth — something Google valued far more highly.

---

(Later, I’ll uncover how this gap caught up with me — and how I rebuilt my skills and mindset. I’ll also share how modern tools like AiToEarn, an open-source global AI content platform, help professionals own their projects across multiple channels and monetize their work.)

---

The PIP Begins

At Google, technical mastery came first. Business context? Always secondary.

I was also adapting to a new language (Hebrew) and culture after moving from the U.S. to Israel.

Once placed on the PIP:

  • Increased work hours to 60+ per week
  • Cut out all distractions — news, side projects, entertainment
  • Focused solely on building technical depth in my assigned systems

It was brutal:

  • Slower than teammates
  • Struggling with confidence
  • Receiving tough, detailed code reviews

But eliminating distractions forced me to confront my biggest gap — insufficient depth in the systems I worked on.

---

The Project

The actual project is confidential, so here’s a hypothetical analogue:

> Add a motivational text element to a Google Search-based game — but first, build the missing data pipeline to track completion rates.

Key challenges:

  • No existing tracking pipeline — required full design and implementation.
  • Post-org restructure, our team had zero gaming code experience.
  • Documentation outdated, original authors long gone.

Breakthroughs:

  • Located and connected with the current owner of relevant systems
  • Prioritized work: focused first on slower Search-side QA tasks to meet deadlines
  • Took full ownership of the game’s code after learning no engineer maintained it

Mistakes & lessons:

  • Chased perfect data accuracy instead of “good enough” for experiments
  • Weeks wasted parsing outdated docs instead of messaging their authors directly

By final two weeks:

I was operating at a whole new level — independently driving the project, unblocking myself, and guiding teammates in the codebase.

Outcome:

Despite massive growth, I narrowly missed the deadline. I delivered a near-complete handoff plan, but in the PIP’s binary criteria, “almost done” equals failure.

---

Fatherhood

During the PIP, long hours left me less present as a father and husband.

Reflection point:

Listening to Dave Ramsey reframed my absence — the disciplined version of me was not neglect, it was a necessary investment in my future ability to provide.

Lesson:

Sometimes short-term unavailability is part of a long-term course correction.

---

Letting Go

After termination:

  • Lost expected annual bonus (which I realized I hadn’t earned)
  • Chose gratitude over frustration
  • Thanked teammates and managers for patience and mentoring during the PIP

Final conversation with my manager:

> Keeping me would require confidence I was already performing at level — which he didn’t have.

I told him I agreed and valued the PIP for the internal engine of ownership it had built in me.

---

What’s Next

I retained my PIP discipline in my job hunt:

  • Built a timeline with priorities, time estimates, and due dates
  • Maintained weekly accountability

Sample Job Hunt Timeline:

| Task | Time Remaining | Due Date |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Highly skilled at easy algorithms | 2 days | Oct 20, 2025 |

| Medium skill at system design | 4–6 days | Oct 24, 2025 |

| Talk to 3 local engineers | 12 hrs weekly | – |

Target: Smaller company with open-source tools, widely used by the engineering community.

Approach: Interview local startup engineers, share learnings on LinkedIn.

---

Closing Thoughts

The PIP stripped away distractions, forced me to face my engineering gaps, and left me proud of my transformation.

Key takeaways for similar situations:

  • Document priorities and milestones
  • Engage with your professional community
  • Use tools to share and potentially monetize your journey

Platforms like AiToEarn exemplify this — integrating AI content generation, cross-platform publishing, and analytics into a single workflow to help creators turn resilience and creativity into visible, monetizable output.

Momentum matters — my acceleration didn’t stop when the PIP ended. The external target changed from project delivery to job hunting, but the internal drive stayed the same.

> Like the Phoenix, I believe in rising from the ashes, no matter how daunting the obstacle.

> The PIP was my ashes — but also my fire.

Read more