# 2024 Standard Edition Flagship Smartphones: A Complete Review & Comparison
The press events and consecutive launches of October have concluded — making now the perfect time to **review this year’s standard edition smartphones** from major brands.
---
## Overview
📉 **Trend Watch**
Compared to the past two years, 2024’s *standard editions* feel collectively muted — significantly less buzz and discussion.
⚖ **Positioning**
The standard edition is a tangled category:
- **Pro models** = balanced all-rounders with robust specs
- **Standard editions** = diverse strategies around ~¥4,400–¥4,500, each attempting to stand out
🎯 **This Year’s “Four Kings”**
- **Xiaomi 17**
- **vivo X300**
- **OPPO Find X9**
- **Honor Magic 8**
I’ve tested all four extensively and compared their major functionalities.
> 💡 *Read on to see which one I chose.*
---
## What Should a Standard Edition Be?
### Chipsets
- **Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5**: Xiaomi 17, Honor Magic 8
- **Dimensity 9500**: OPPO Find X9, vivo X300
Benchmark insight:
- **CPU scores**: Snapdragon leads
- **GPU performance**: nearly equal, sometimes Dimensity slightly better
- **Real-world use**: daily tasks & high-load gaming show smaller gaps due to software optimization.
### Sizes & Weights
| Size | Models | Weight |
|------------|---------------------------|--------|
| **6.3"** | Xiaomi 17, vivo X300 | 190–191g |
| **6.6"** | OPPO Find X9, Honor Magic 8| 203–205g |
Small-screen flagships = superior grip, weaker battery & heat management.
Two philosophies: differentiate from Pro or mimic it closely.
---
## Head‑to‑Head Comparisons
### vivo X300 vs Xiaomi 17
- **Design**
- vivo’s large round *Deco* now slimmer via back panel slopes; more elegant than X200 Pro mini
- Xiaomi’s refreshed design feels less premium — more in REDMI territory
- **Ergonomics**
- Both: excellent hand feel (6.3", ~190g, smooth mid-frame)
- vivo: matte texture
- Xiaomi: slightly better grip balance
- **Camera Strategy**
- vivo: 200MP main camera, Pro uses 200MP telephoto — a deliberate spec choice
- Xiaomi: competitive imaging but lacks equal flagship premium feel
- **Screen & Battery**
- vivo: dimmer outdoor brightness, smaller 6040mAh battery
- Xiaomi: brighter screen, larger 7000mAh battery, ~2h longer runtime
---
### OPPO Find X9 vs Honor Magic 8
- **Design Continuity**
- OPPO: standard and Pro almost identical — supports "offline-first" strategy
- HONOR: clear Pro vs standard differentiation; Pro has quad-curved display
- **User Experience**
- OPPO: ColorOS smoothness, balanced configuration
- HONOR: decent but fingerprint unlock weaker than competitors
---
## OS & AI Feature Comparison
### vivo X300 (OriginOS 6) vs Xiaomi 17 (HyperOS 3)
**HyperOS 3**:
- Fluidity & animations clearly improved
- Variety in customization (lock screen themes & interactions) unmatched among Chinese Android OS
- Avoids overuse of "glass" effects — retains Xiaomi DNA
**OriginOS 6**:
- Adds lively light-sensing animations
- Mixed visual styles lead to slight chaos
- Occasional app freezes in major apps (Camera, WeChat, Taobao)
---
### OPPO Find X9 (ColorOS 16) vs Honor Magic 8 (MagicOS 10)
**MagicOS 10**:
- Smooth animations but usability quirks; e.g., cumbersome fingerprint unlock from lock screen
**ColorOS 16**:
- Consistently user-friendly with small yet impactful touches
- Best "on-island" app ecosystem support among Androids (e.g., McDonald’s Live Activities)
**AI Tools**:
- OPPO's *Flash Notes* & proactive Fluid Cloud cards for mini-app data
- HONOR’s *YOYO Suggestions* = most practical AI widget recommendations (train codes, delivery pickups, clothing suggestions)
- YOYO Memory weaker than OPPO’s AI note-taking — lacks video analysis
---
## Imaging Performance
### vivo X300 vs OPPO Find X9
- **vivo X300**:
- 200MP main camera, superb resolving power
- Night scenes less consistent
- Telephoto ranks best among 2024 standards; supports macro
- **OPPO Find X9**:
- Best night scene output — balanced contrast & detail
- Telephoto weaker, no macro support
- Hasselblad tuning for strong stylistic shots (Master/XPAN modes)
---
### Xiaomi 17 vs Honor Magic 8
- **Daytime**:
- Xiaomi with Leica: richer tonal quality, appealing portraits
- HONOR: slightly brighter frames, less distinctive color science
- **Night**:
- Xiaomi struggles with highlights; HONOR retains better balance
- **Selfies**:
- Xiaomi: refined skin rendering even with beauty mode
- HONOR: natural mode acceptable but unremarkable
---
## Final Ranking & Recommendation
**Ranking**:
1. **vivo X300** — best balance in ergonomics, system, imaging, plus standout configs
2. **OPPO Find X9**
3. **Xiaomi 17**
4. **Honor Magic 8**
📌 **Buying Advice**:
Standard editions often offer the core flagship experience without niche, advanced specs — great for students or young professionals. True value appears as prices trend toward ¥4000.
🎯 **Future Challenge for OEMs**:
Make standard editions **baseline flagship experiences** — not cut-down versions.
---
## The Bigger Picture
While domestic Android flagships have improved, entry models in mainline series sometimes compromise on specs & cost-effectiveness.
The *sweet spot* lies in achieving parity in imaging, build, configuration, and fine-tuning with high-end models — maintaining only small experiential gaps.
---
## Tools for Modern Creators
Platforms like [AiToEarn官网](https://aitoearn.ai/) enable **AI-powered content creation, publishing, analytics, and monetization** across Douyin, Kwai, Bilibili, Xiaohongshu, Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, Threads, YouTube, Pinterest, X(Twitter), and more — perfect for leveraging a standard flagship's capabilities in a creator workflow.
---
**Bottom Line**:
Balance, thoughtful design, and everyday usability define the best standard edition flagships of 2024. Among them, the vivo X300 earns the crown — not by sheer specifications, but for delivering the most cohesive and refined overall experience.
